Teaser

Before diving into fieldwork, I’m taking stock of Michel Foucault and the governmentality tradition to ask how “addiction” gets constituted as a problem, managed as a risk, and lived as a practice of the self. This reading pays special attention to Histoire de la folie, Discipline and Punish, and The History of Sexuality, and then extends to followers and heirs who help us grasp addiction as a governed and confessed relation to self and population.


Why Foucault for addiction?

Foucault urges us to shift from “what addiction is” to how it became thinkable—through discourses, practices, and institutions that make certain truths actionable. Read this way, addiction emerges at the intersection of clinic, court, charity, market, and media—produced and governed rather than merely discovered. See Foucault’s genealogies of madness (1961/64), discipline (1975), and sexuality (1976–) for the template of such problematizations. Foucault, 1961/1972/2013; Foucault, 1975/1977; Foucault, 1976/1978. (Gallimard)


Three pillars for reading addiction

1) Madness, exclusion, and the medical gaze

2) Discipline, normalization, compliance

3) Biopolitics, risk, and populations


Confession and the technologies of the self

Foucault’s analyses of confession (Vol. I of History of Sexuality) and later writings on self-techniques let us see intake interviews, relapse-prevention plans, and mutual-aid testimonies as truth-producing practices that shape responsible, self-managing subjects—without reducing them to manipulation. Foucault, 1976/1978; Foucault, 1988. (PenguinRandomhouse.com)


Lines of descent: followers, readers, and allies


A dialogue with rational choice (in honor of Norman Braun)

From Norman Braun I learned to model drug use as locally rational under constraints (prices, availability, peers, stress)—a diagnosis, not a eulogy, of rationality. Coupled with Foucault, we can ask who builds those constraints, which truths authorize them, and how subjects are formed to choose. Braun’s monograph remains a touchstone for integrating sociological and economic reasoning about drugs. Braun, 2002/2014 reprint. (De Gruyter Brill)


Working propositions for empirical research

  1. Problematizations move: trace shifts (vice → disease → risk → neurochemical self).
  2. Apparatus mapping: clinics, courts, pharmacies, platforms as a dispositif formatting conduct.
  3. Confessional economies: how assessment tools and testimonies produce truth and allocate responsibility.
  4. Security vs. discipline: when do we govern populations (harm reduction, MUP) vs. bodies (punitive containment)?
  5. Technologies of the self: diaries, tracking, mutual aid as ethical practices of sobriety/safer use.

Method note (Grounded Theory)

As in my other projects, I proceed in Grounded Theory mode (memoing, coding, constant comparison). Each post is a public memo; the outline will grow with the project as concepts stabilize or shift.


AI co-author disclosure

I work with an AI co-author for outlining, synthesis, and drafting; I remain responsible for the final selection, verification, and argument. Any generative vignettes will be marked [HYPOTHESIS].


Literature & Links (APA)


Prüfprotokoll (Validation)


Discover more from SocioloVerse.AI

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply