Teaser

I’m starting this project because I can’t stop asking a simple question with complicated answers: what does society have to do with addiction? This blog is my public lab—where I think aloud, test ideas, and build a book—drawing on classical sociology, contemporary theory, psychology, medicine, and economics. And of course: Reflect my own experiences with a widely socially accepted drug: alcohol.


Why I’m here

I was shaped by teachers and texts that refuse easy explanations. Norman Braun, Jutta Allmendinger, Ulrich Beck, Armin Nassehi, Debra Minkoff, and many more trained me in Munich to see social phenomena, social problems, social inequalities like (any form of) drug use through the lens of local rationality—people optimize under constraints, even when outcomes harm them (Braun 2002). Jack London’s John Barleycorn gave me literary honesty about intoxication’s seductions and costs (London 1913/2010). Gabor Maté‘s lecture taught me to read addiction as a response to pain and disconnection (Maté 2010). Their threads converge in what I love about sociology: we explain without reducing—holding brains, biographies, and institutions together.


Addicted to sociology (and why that helps)

Sociology is my antidote to fatalism. When I say I’m “addicted to sociology,” I mean I keep returning to its concepts because they open possibility: if addiction is socially patterned and governed, then social worlds can be rebuilt.

This mix lets me treat addiction as practice (what people do), policy target (what institutions count and govern), and story (what people must say to be heard and helped).


What this blog will do

  1. Theory in focus. Short, accessible profiles of classic and contemporary thinkers, always asking: what do they change in how we see addiction?
  2. Case memos [HYPOTHESIS]. Carefully anonymized vignettes that put theory to work.
  3. Methods windows. Grounded Theory notes, coding moves, small visual maps.
  4. Policy briefs. Concise syntheses on pricing, availability, harm reduction, and stigma.
  5. Press review. Curated updates with sociological takeaways.

How I think: a Grounded Theory workflow

Like my other projects, I work Grounded Theory–style: reading, memoing, coding, comparing, theorizing. I publish memos in public, so concepts remain provisional until the evidence stabilizes them (Glaser & Strauss 1967). The outline grows with the project: I will revise earlier posts when new materials shift the map.


Ethics and stance

Three commitments guide me:


Why now?

We live in an attention economy that engineers compulsion, a care system strained by inequality, and an information landscape where certainty sells. A sociological lens helps me resist both moralism and neuro-determinism. It keeps me with the human in the middle—the person in a field of forces—and it keeps policy accountable to evidence and justice.


How I use AI (co-author disclosure)

I collaborate with an AI assistant for outlining, synthesis, and draft polishing. I remain responsible for concept selection, verification, and argument; any generative case fragments are marked [HYPOTHESIS]. This partnership lets me iterate faster while keeping scholarly standards.


Literature & Links



Discover more from SocioloVerse.AI

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply